Introduction: This report is created for the benefit of strategic planners who seek in-depth study of the Global Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market . It is compiled for the sake of organizations considering Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) industry and those who want to boost their market value from their existing investments. With the advent of globalization of the Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) industry, market insights about the continents, countries, regions, as well as cities become the most important criteria while prioritizing markets. The consumption patterns, customer and supplier bargaining power and the structural analysis of the application fields is given in the study. This report covers top 200 countries and other entities operating in the market.

The Global Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Cybernetics Market report provides information by Key Players, Geography, End users, Applications, Competitor analysis, Sales, Revenue, Price, Gross Margin, Market Share, Import-Export, Trends and Forecast. Initially, the report provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. The Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Cybernetics market analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. Effect of COVID-19: Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Cybernetics Market report investigate the effect of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on the Military Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Cybernetics industry. Since December 2020, the COVID-19 infection spread to practically 180 nations around the world with the World Health Organization pronouncing it a general wellbeing crisis.

A new bipartisan congressional report calls for the Defense Department to get a lot more serious about the race to acquire artificial intelligence and autonomous capabilities, modeling efforts to become dominant in these spheres after the "Manhattan Project" initiative to test and develop nuclear weapons in the 1940s. On Tuesday, the House Armed Services Committee released the results of a yearlong review, co-led by Reps. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., and Jim Banks, R-Ind., aimed at assessing U.S. military capabilities and preparedness to meet current threats. The 87-page Future of Defense Task Force Report contains some expected findings -- China and Russia are identified as the top security threats to the U.S. and modernization is described as an urgent need -- but there are surprising points of emphasis. The report leans hard into technological development and growth, particularly in the fields of machine learning and autonomy, going so far as to call for the Defense Department to evaluate an AI or autonomous alternative prior to every major future defense buy.

Last March, Chinese researchers announced an ingenious and potentially devastating attack against one of America's most prized technological assets--a Tesla electric car. The team, from the security lab of the Chinese tech giant Tencent, demonstrated several ways to fool the AI algorithms on Tesla's car. By subtly altering the data fed to the car's sensors, the researchers were able to bamboozle and bewilder the artificial intelligence that runs the vehicle. In one case, a TV screen contained a hidden pattern that tricked the windshield wipers into activating. In another, lane markings on the road were ever-so-slightly modified to confuse the autonomous driving system so that it drove over them and into the lane for oncoming traffic.

Kanaan is generally very bullish about AI, partly because he knows firsthand how useful it stands to be for troops. Six years ago, as an Air Force intelligence officer in Afghanistan, he was responsible for deploying a new kind of intelligence-gathering tool: a hyperspectral imager. The instrument can spot objects that are normally hidden from view, like tanks draped in camouflage or emissions from an improvised bomb-making factory. Kanaan says the system helped US troops remove many thousands of pounds of explosives from the battlefield. Even so, it was often impractical for analysts to process the vast amounts of data collected by the imager.

Changing geopolitical strategy and rapid technological progress are also conspiring to render the term military increasingly incoherent. The United States--the one power to emerge unscathed from World War II and ascendant from the Cold War, and the one power that invests the greatest amount of resources in its battle-hardened military--possesses such overwhelming conventional military superiority over anyone else that potential adversaries instead embrace asymmetric warfare. Thus, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, wrote in a seminal article in 2014 that "the very'rules of war' have changed. The role of nonmilitary means of achieving political and strategic goals has ... in many cases ... exceeded the power of force of weapons in their effectiveness." He also spoke of the need for "the broad use of political, economic, informational, humanitarian, and other nonmilitary measures," with conventional force "resorted to ... primarily for the achievement of final success in the conflict."